OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

UPA PERPUSTAKAAN UNEJ | NPP. 3509212D1000001

  • Home
  • Admin
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses
Bookmark Share

Text

Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses

Yves Gingras - Personal Name;

Why bibliometrics is useful for understanding the global dynamics of science but generate perverse effects when applied inappropriately in research evaluation and university rankings. The research evaluation market is booming. “Ranking,” “metrics,” “h-index,” and “impact factors” are reigning buzzwords. Government and research administrators want to evaluate everything—teachers, professors, training programs, universities—using quantitative indicators. Among the tools used to measure “research excellence,” bibliometrics —aggregate data on publications and citations—has become dominant. Bibliometrics is hailed as an “objective” measure of research quality, a quantitative measure more useful than “subjective” and intuitive evaluation methods such as peer review that have been used since scientific papers were first published in the seventeenth century. In this book, Yves Gingras offers a spirited argument against an unquestioning reliance on bibliometrics as an indicator of research quality. Gingras shows that bibliometric rankings have no real scientific validity, rarely measuring what they pretend to. Although the study of publication and citation patterns, at the proper scales, can yield insights on the global dynamics of science over time, ill-defined quantitative indicators often generate perverse and unintended effects on the direction of research. Moreover, abuse of bibliometrics occurs when data is manipulated to boost rankings. Gingras looks at the politics of evaluation and argues that using numbers can be a way to control scientists and diminish their autonomy in the evaluation process. Proposing precise criteria for establishing the validity of indicators at a given scale of analysis, Gingras questions why universities are so eager to let invalid indicators influence their research strategy.


Availability

No copy data

Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
-
Publisher
Cambridge : The MIT Press., 2017
Collation
-
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
9780262337656
Classification
NONE
Content Type
text
Media Type
computer
Carrier Type
online resource
Edition
-
Subject(s)
-
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
Yves Gingras
Other Information
Cataloger
Jemadi
Source
-
Validator
-
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
-
Journal Volume
-
Journal Issue
-
Subtitle
-
Parallel Title
-
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
  • Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject


Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search
Where do you want to share?