OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

UPA PERPUSTAKAAN UNEJ | NPP. 3509212D1000001

  • Home
  • Admin
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title
Bookmark Share

Better than conscious? :decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions

Ernst Str?ungmann Forum - Personal Name; Engel, Christoph, - Personal Name; Singer, W. - Personal Name;

Forum held June 10-15, 2007 in Frankfurt, Germany.Experts discuss the implications of the ways humans reach decisions through the conscious and subconscious processing of information. Conscious control enables human decision makers to override routines, to exercise willpower, to find innovative solutions, to learn by instruction, to decide collectively, and to justify their choices. These and many more advantages, however, come at a price: the ability to process information consciously is severely limited and conscious decision makers are liable to hundreds of biases. Measured against the norms of rational choice theory, conscious decision makers perform poorly. But if people forego conscious control, in appropriate tasks, they perform surprisingly better: they handle vast amounts of information; they update prior information; they find appropriate solutions to ill-defined problems. This inaugural Strungmann Forum Report explores the human ability to make decisions, consciously as well as without conscious control. It explores decision-making strategies, including deliberate and intuitive; explicit and implicit; processing information serially and in parallel, with a general-purpose apparatus, or with task-specific neural subsystems. The analysis is at four levels--neural, psychological, evolutionary, and institutional--and the discussion is extended to the definition of social problems and the design of better institutional interventions. The results presented differ greatly from what could be expected under standard rational choice theory and deviate even more from the alternate behavioral view of institutions. New challenges emerge (for example, the issue of free will) and some purported social problems almost disappear if one adopts a more adequate model of human decision making.OCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.


Availability

No copy data

Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
-
Publisher
Cambridge, Mass. : : MIT Press,., 2008.
Collation
1 online resource (xiv, 449 pages) :illustrations (some color).
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
9780262272353
Classification
-
Content Type
-
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
-
Subject(s)
Decision making
Cognitive Neuroscience
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
edited by Christoph Engel and Wolf Singer ; program advisory committee: Christoph Engel [and others].
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
No Data
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject


Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search
Where do you want to share?