Text

Fact-Gathering in Patent infringement Cases : Rule 34 Discovery and The Saisie-Contrefaçon

---

“Inventions, their exploitation, and the related prior art being inherently scientific and technical in nature, have a proclivity for recordation of information directed to their development, particulars of construction, modification, and application in documents.”¹ In fact, documents, tangible items and processes embody the most vital evidence available for proving patent validity and infringement.² As such, document discovery constitutes the evidentiary foundation of most patent infringement actions.³

In United States law, Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Federal Rules or Rules) addresses production of documents, tangible things and inspection of premises

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

-

Call Number

340 SEI f

Publisher

Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG., 2009

Collation

58 halaman

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

9783845219714

Classification

340

Content Type

text

Media Type

computer

Carrier Type

online resource

Edition

1

Subject(s)

Law / Commercial

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

Esther Seitz

Other Information

Cataloger

agus

Source

-

Validator

maya

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

-

Journal Volume

-

Journal Issue

-

Subtitle

-

Parallel Title

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment