Text

Chapter 13 The Role of Neuroscience in Precise, Precautionary, and Probabilistic Accounts of Sentience

---

Given that there is currently no consensus as to exactly which animals are sentient, how should we make moral decisions when we are uncertain as to which of the animals influenced by that decision are sentient? And how relevant is evidence from the neurosciences for making these decisions? In this chapter, I outline three different approaches toward incorporating uncertainty about sentience into moral decision-making: what I call precise, precautionary, and probabilistic approaches to sentience. I suggest that neuroscientific evidence has different relevance for each of these accounts. Precautionary approaches should be adopted to provide basic protections for animals even when we are uncertain about their sentience, but probabilistic accounts are more relevant for decisions where we need to carefully weigh positive and negative consequences of different possible decisions. Precise accounts can be useful for providing guidance but are not directly relevant for making decisions or guiding policy.

---

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information

Series Title

-

Call Number

-

Publisher

: Springer Nature., 2020

Collation

-

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

-

Classification

NONE

Content Type

text

Media Type

computer

Carrier Type

online resource

Edition

1

Subject(s)

-

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other Information

Cataloger

Hasan

Source

https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/63969

Validator

-

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

-

Journal Volume

-

Journal Issue

-

Subtitle

-

Parallel Title

-

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment