Image of In Defense of Monopoly : How Market Power Fosters Creative Production
Bookmark Share

Text

In Defense of Monopoly : How Market Power Fosters Creative Production

In Defense of Monopoly offers an unconventional but empirically grounded argument in favor of market monopolies. Authors McKenzie and Lee claim that conventional, static models exaggerate the harm done by real-world monopolies, and they show why some degree of monopoly presence is necessary to maximize the improvement of human welfare over time. Inspired by Joseph Schumpeter's suggestion that market imperfections can drive an economy's long-term progress, In Defense of Monopoly defies conventional assumptions to show readers why an economic system's failure to efficiently allocate its resources is actually a necessary precondition for maximizing the system's long-term performance: the perfectly fluid, competitive economy idealized by most economists is decidedly inferior to one characterized by market entry and exit restrictions or costs.

Disponibilidade

No copy data

Detail Information
Título da série
-
Número de chamada
650
Editora
: .,
Paginação
-
Idioma
English
ISBN/ISSN
9780472116157
Classificação
650
Content Type
text
Media Type
computer
Carrier Type
-
Edição
-
Assunto(s)
Business and Economics
Detalhe específico
-
Statement of Responsibility
Other Information
Cataloger
rat
Source
https://openresearchlibrary.org/content/ca40723a-e63a-4b07-a1b5-68648e18f8af
Other version/related

No other version available

Arquivo anexo
  • In Defense of Monopoly : How Market Power Fosters Creative Production
    In Defense of Monopoly offers an unconventional but empirically grounded argument in favor of market monopolies. Authors McKenzie and Lee claim that conventional, static models exaggerate the harm done by real-world monopolies, and they show why some degree of monopoly presence is necessary to maximize the improvement of human welfare over time. Inspired by Joseph Schumpeter's suggestion that market imperfections can drive an economy's long-term progress, In Defense of Monopoly defies conventional assumptions to show readers why an economic system's failure to efficiently allocate its resources is actually a necessary precondition for maximizing the system's long-term performance: the perfectly fluid, competitive economy idealized by most economists is decidedly inferior to one characterized by market entry and exit restrictions or costs.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment