Image of Regional Economic Development Compared
Bookmark Share

Text

Regional Economic Development Compared

Comparing economic development in a regional context both in the South of the United States and in the European Union today raises many fascinating questions. How much money in the form of tax credits and subsidies should communities and states invest to attract foreign investors in the U.S.? Should individual states and communities in the U.S. commit public funds in the form of tax money and tax credits etc. to bring foreign businesses to their shores? Is the argument of bringing “jobs” and more employment home the only argument that should count politically? Or might these generous subsidies doled out to foreign businesses from public funds deprive local populations from improving their infrastructure and public education? What if these foreign investors then locate to other shores if their investments are not profitable enough in the short run? Might foreign investors come to the American South because it has never been unionized like the rest of the country? Is the attraction of the non-union South then only a means to get away from the burdens of stricter worker protection and social programs at home in Germany or Austria or elsewhere?

Availability

No copy data

Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
650
Publisher
: .,
Collation
-
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
9783902936424
Classification
650
Content Type
-
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
-
Subject(s)
Business and Economics
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
Other Information
Cataloger
rat
Source
https://openresearchlibrary.org/content/e5982939-7212-4229-853f-9325a48730fd
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
  • Regional Economic Development Compared
    Comparing economic development in a regional context both in the South of the United States and in the European Union today raises many fascinating questions. How much money in the form of tax credits and subsidies should communities and states invest to attract foreign investors in the U.S.? Should individual states and communities in the U.S. commit public funds in the form of tax money and tax credits etc. to bring foreign businesses to their shores? Is the argument of bringing “jobs” and more employment home the only argument that should count politically? Or might these generous subsidies doled out to foreign businesses from public funds deprive local populations from improving their infrastructure and public education? What if these foreign investors then locate to other shores if their investments are not profitable enough in the short run? Might foreign investors come to the American South because it has never been unionized like the rest of the country? Is the attraction of the non-union South then only a means to get away from the burdens of stricter worker protection and social programs at home in Germany or Austria or elsewhere?
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment