OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

UPA PERPUSTAKAAN UNEJ | NPP. 3509212D1000001

  • Home
  • Admin
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of 7 Urban ecosystem services and stakeholders
Bookmark Share

Text

7 Urban ecosystem services and stakeholders

MAKELA, Hannele - Personal Name; KUJALA, Johanna - Personal Name; HEIKKINEN, Anna - Personal Name;

This chapter argues that the discussion of urban sustainability is in urgent need of new understanding of how ecosystem services are generated in places where human and non-human stakeholders interact within the urban landscape. More than half of the world’s population currently lives in urban areas, and the rate of urbanisation is estimated to increase rapidly in the next three decades ( United Nations, 2014 ). This scale of urbanisation strains both urban and rural ecosystems, which are required to provide nutrition, clean water, fresh air, recreational opportunities, wellbeing and other life-supporting and life-enhancing opportunities to urban dwellers ( Chiesura and de Groot, 2003 ; Fischer and Eastwood, 2016 ; Standish, Hobbs, and Miller, 2013 ). Amidst such challenges as rapid urbanisation and abrupt climatic changes, ecosystem services are needed to provide the material and non-material benefi ts required to keep ever-growing cities liveable ( Alberti, 2016 ; Andersson et al., 2014 ; Finco and Nijkamp, 2001 ; Rees and Wackernagel, 1996 ). However, the current understanding of ecosystem services is inadequate, and the extant research has been criticised for both its anthropocentric bias and its focus on instrumental and monetary valuations of ecosystem services ( Pelenc and Ballet, 2015 ; Schröter et al., 2014 ). Moreover, the lack of a detailed elaboration of the socio-ecological interface of ecosystem services has resulted in the continued segregation of human and non-human processes in ecosystem service generation ( Andersson, Barthel, and Ahrné, 2007 ; Fischer and Eastwood, 2016 ; Maes et al., 2012 )


Availability

No copy data

Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
650
Publisher
London : ., 2019
Collation
-
Language
English
ISBN/ISSN
9780815387213
Classification
650
Content Type
-
Media Type
computer
Carrier Type
online resource
Edition
-
Subject(s)
-
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
Hannele Makela, Johanna Kujala, Anna Heikkinen
Other Information
Cataloger
rat
Source
https://openresearchlibrary.org/content/348a3c1f-2d4c-4e2f-9cc4-dd65619fac36
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
  • 7 Urban ecosystem services and stakeholders
    This chapter argues that the discussion of urban sustainability is in urgent need of new understanding of how ecosystem services are generated in places where human and non-human stakeholders interact within the urban landscape. More than half of the world’s population currently lives in urban areas, and the rate of urbanisation is estimated to increase rapidly in the next three decades ( United Nations, 2014 ). This scale of urbanisation strains both urban and rural ecosystems, which are required to provide nutrition, clean water, fresh air, recreational opportunities, wellbeing and other life-supporting and life-enhancing opportunities to urban dwellers ( Chiesura and de Groot, 2003 ; Fischer and Eastwood, 2016 ; Standish, Hobbs, and Miller, 2013 ). Amidst such challenges as rapid urbanisation and abrupt climatic changes, ecosystem services are needed to provide the material and non-material benefi ts required to keep ever-growing cities liveable ( Alberti, 2016 ; Andersson et al., 2014 ; Finco and Nijkamp, 2001 ; Rees and Wackernagel, 1996 ). However, the current understanding of ecosystem services is inadequate, and the extant research has been criticised for both its anthropocentric bias and its focus on instrumental and monetary valuations of ecosystem services ( Pelenc and Ballet, 2015 ; Schröter et al., 2014 ). Moreover, the lack of a detailed elaboration of the socio-ecological interface of ecosystem services has resulted in the continued segregation of human and non-human processes in ecosystem service generation ( Andersson, Barthel, and Ahrné, 2007 ; Fischer and Eastwood, 2016 ; Maes et al., 2012 )
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject


Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search
Where do you want to share?